Prior to the twentieth century, the churches of Québec recorded and held the
vital records of the province. The churches were required to provide the
provincial government copies of all birth, marriage, and death records, which
serve as the official vital record. These provincial copies are known as the
Registres d’état civile. When using microfilm copies of Québec church
records, it is important to note whether you are using the Registres d’état
civile, the original parish registers, or a copy of the registers. The
copies and transcriptions often do not contain all of the information from the
original parish record.
If you are using microfilms from the Family History Library, you are most
likely using the civil registers, not the original parish registers. The Family
History Library Catalog classifies both the originals and the civil copies as
church records. It is important to read the notes on the title page of any
catalog entry to discover which records you are using.
While looking for the registers for St. Norbert d’Arthabaska, Québec, the
town where my grandmother was born, I found three entries: Registres
parioussiaux 1888-1900 Eglise Catholique Saint Norbert d’Arthabaska;
Registres parioussiaux 1845-1884 Eglise Catholique Saint Norbert
d’Arthabaska; and Registres parioussiaux 1845-1877 Eglise Catholique
Saint Norbert d’Arthabaska. The first two entries contain the words
“Microfilm des originaux dans les Archives nationales du Québec à
Trois-Rivières, Québec” in the notes field on the title page. This indicates
that these entries are from the civil copy of the parish registers that now
resides in the Archives Nationales de Québec at the Trois Rivières branch. The
last entry reads “Microfilm des originaux dans le Presbytère de St.-Norbert,”
which refers to the original church records still kept in the church at St.
There are several additional reasons why it is important to know which copy
of the registers you are viewing. First, when trying to retrace your steps, it
is helpful to know exactly which microfilm you are using. And when you are
dealing with multiple copies of a record it is critical to ensure that you are
looking at the same document time after time. Page numbers may differ from copy
to copy. Whenever an item is copied there is the possibility for error. Names
can be erroneously transcribed or omitted completely. Words that are illegible
in one copy may be legible in another. One of the copies may have become damaged
by water, mold, or simply by the aging process. Knowing which copy has already
been checked will keep you from having to retrace your steps.
One major difficulty is in determining which is the “original” copy. The
priests and ministers were told only that they had to turn over a list of all
births, marriages, and deaths in the parish during the course of the year. Some
priests kept one set of books and copied them at the end of the year when all
the entries were complete. Others kept two sets of books concurrently, sending
one off to the government at the beginning of the next year. In this instance,
which copy could be considered the “original”?Corrections may have been
made to the registers where incorrect or omitted words were added when copying.
If you find a record is incomplete, make sure you check the other copy to see if
the missing information is there.
The priests were supposed to prepare an index for the records each year.
Unfortunately, some registers were either not indexed or the indexes were lost
over time. The arrangement of the indexes varies from parish to parish. Some
priests listed all baptisms first, then the marriages, then the burials, putting
each section in alphabetical order. Here is an example of one of these indexes
from the parish of l’Avenir. [l’Avenir 1].
Click on image for large view
Other times, the names were gathered together onomastically only. This means
that all names were gathered together by the first letter of the surname, but
they do not appear in strict alphabetical order.
Another common “index” was compiled when the priest listed in chronological
order the names of the subjects of the records as they appeared in the register.
They would then list the page number that the name appeared on. Sometimes the
priest made columns and indicated next to the name whether the act was a
marriage, baptism for a boy, baptism for a girl, death of a male, or death of a
female. This made it easier to compile statistical information for the parish.
Here is an example of this kind of index from the parish of St. Antoine de la
Baie du Febvre in Yamaska County. [St. Antoine 1835 Index].
Because of the strict structure of the Catholic Church, the language for
baptisms, marriages, and burials varies little from parish to parish. Sometimes
the priests used flowery language, but the major points will be immediately
recognizable after you have researched the registers for only a little while.
Here is an example of a birth/baptism entry of my grandfather, Joseph Alfred
Leclerc, from the parish of St. Zepherin de Courval in Nicolet County.
Le quinze aout mil neuf cent douze, nous prêtre soussigné avons ???????
danté baptisé Joseph Alfred , né la veille, fils legitime de Joseph Le-clerc
journalier et de Regina Boisvert Central Falls Etats Unis Parrain Narcisse
Boisvert, marraine Julie Dionne son épouse de Sainte Brigitte lesquelles ont
declaré ne savoir signer. Le père absent. Lecture faite. Trois mots soyés nuls.
H. Desilets, Ptre.
Translated, this reads,
The fifteenth of August one thousand nine hundred and twelve we the
undersigned priest??????? danté have baptized Joseph Alfred, born the
night before last, the legitimate son of Joseph Leclerc, day laborer, and Regina
Boisvert Central Falls United States Godfather Narcisse Boisvert Godmother Julie
Dionne his wife of Sainte Brigitte those having declared they did not know how
to sign their names. The father was absent. Lecture given. Three words were
H. Desilets, Priest
There are two major clues in this record: the first is that Joseph Leclerc
and Regina Boisvert were living in Central Falls (Massachusetts) in the United
States at the time that their son was baptized at St. Zepherin. The other is
that Narcisse Boisvert and Julie Dionne were living in Ste. Brigitte. This
record confirms my grandfather’s story that his parents were visiting his
mother’s relatives at St. Zepherine when he was born, and that his grandparents
served as his godparents (a very common occurrence). His grandmother died soon
after his baptism, and the notation of Ste. Brigitte gives a clue as to where
her death may have been recorded.
Julie Dionne’s grandparents Alexis Lepellé dit Lahaie and Anastasie Chassé
were married at St. Antoine de La Baie du Febvre in Yamaska County on August 9,
1831. Here is a copy of the marriage record from the parish registers.
Click on image for large view
Le neuf d’aoust mil huit cent trente et un ????? Nous Prêtre soussigné
a été aprés la Publication de trois Bans de mariage fait au Prône la
messe paroissial pendant trois dimanches consécutifs ___ ____ _____ entre Aléxis
Lepellé dit Lahaie, cultivateur dans cette paroisse fils majeur de deffunt Louis
Lepellé dit Lahaie et de deffunt Louise Charette ses père et mère d’un parte et
Anastasie Chassé fille majeur de François Chassé, cultivateur dans cette
Paroisse et de Josephte Corbin sa père et mère d’autre part; n’étant trouvé
The ninth of August One Thousand hundred thirty-one ???? we the
undersigned priest after the publication of three banns of marriage made at
the sermon at the parish mass during three consecutive Sundays ____ ____ ____
betwen Aléxis Lepellé dit Lahaie, farmer in this parish son in the majority of
the late Louis Lepellé and of the late Louise Charette his father and mother of
one part and Anastasie Chassé daughter in the majority of François Chassé,
farmer in this parish and of Josephte Corbin her father and mother of the other
part having found no opposition
The burial record for Onésime Leclerc, Joseph Leclerc’s grandfather, is an
example of a typical death record in the parish registers.
Click on image for large view
Le dix-neuf octobre mil huit cent quatre-vingt treize nous curé soussigné,
avons inhumé dans le cimetière de cette paroisse, le corps de Onésime Leclerc,
cultivateur, épouse de Marcelline Provencher dit Villebrun, de cette paroisse,
décédé l’avant-veille, en cette paroisse, âgé d’environ soisante-quatre ans.
Présente à l’inhumation Abraham Leclerc et Emmanuel Leclerc, qui ont signé avec
nous. Lecture faite.
E. Manseau, Ptre Curé
The nineteenth of October one thousand eight hundred ninety-three we the
undersigned curé have buried in the cemetery of this parish the body of Onésime
Leclerc, farmer, husband of Marcelline Provencher dit Villebrun, of this parish,
died the day before yesterday, in this parish, age approximately sixty-four
years. Present at the burial were Abraham Leclerc and Emmanuel Leclerc who have
signed with us. Lecture given.
Please follow these links for related information on Canadian Church
Records and Advanced
Sources for French Canadian Research.