Gregor Mendel was fortunate that he was a pea-picker, because he chanced upon
a plant in which the wrinkling and the other features were all controlled by
single genes, acting independently. Of course the term "gene" was unknown until
1909, and there were many other popular concepts of heredity before scientists
began to zero in on DNA. The advent of the microscope brought with it an
appreciation of micro-organisms and their complexities. The theory of
"spontaneous generation" was widely held before 1865, when Louis Pasteur cast
serious doubts upon it. Later in the 19th century, Friedrich Miescher proposed
that heredity could be controlled by large molecules of protein.
The
Puzzle of Hemophilia
The appearance of a hemorrhagic disease in the
family of Queen Victoria of England attracted considerable attention, as it
occurred in related royal families and in males who were heirs to various
thrones. It first appeared in her son Leopold at the age of twelve. Although he
was the eighth of nine children, he was the only one to suffer from a disease
which would become known as hemophilia A, or classic hemophilia. He bruised
easily, was frequently ill and suffered from a chronic injury to one knee. He
survived to adulthood, married and had one daughter, but died shortly after
reinjuring his knee. Then Alexis, the son of one Czar Nicholas II of Russia,
developed hemophilia. His mother, Alexandra, was a grand-daughter of Queen
Victoria. The disease also affected the Spanish Royal Family. Naturally the
involvement of inbred royalty resulted in considerable attention to this
hemorrhagic disease, long before the defective clotting methods were
understood.
Many years later extensive research would show that
hemophilia A is caused by a faulty gene located in the X chromosome. But long
before this, it was appreciated that the disease is almost entirely limited to
males, all of whose sons will be normal and all of whose daughters will be
obligatory carriers of the trait. Daughters of these carriers have a 50% chance
of also being carriers. Doctors were taught that hemophilia should be suspected
from the sex of the patient and the presence of similar cases in the family
tree. They confirmed their suspicions by performing various laboratory tests.
Although blood platelet function, bleeding time and the number of platelets
present were normal, other coagulation tests would show a pattern typical of
hemophilia.
Studying diseases such as hemophilia helped define some of
the patterns, if not the mechanisms, of heredity. At the same time, puzzling
sporadic exceptions occurred in 15 to 20% of the males. Because hemophilia A has
a high mutation rate, about a third of these patients have no family history of
the disease, nor are any of the lab test of help. The classic inheritance
pattern looks like this:
| |
Parents
|
|
|
|
Offspring
|
|
Male
|
|
Female
|
|
Males
|
|
Females
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hemophilic
|
+
|
Normal
|
|
100% Normal
|
|
100% Carrier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal
|
+
|
Carrier
|
|
50% Hemophilic
|
|
50% Carrier
|
| |
|
|
|
50% Normal
|
|
50% Normal
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hemophilic
|
+
|
Carrier
|
|
50% Hemophilic
|
|
50% Hemophilic
|
| |
|
|
|
50% Normal
|
|
50% Normal
|
From Levine PH, Ch 7: Hemostasis and Thrombosis, Coleman, RW et
al, Eds. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1982
Heredity and the
Blood
The feeling that all heredity was based upon the blood was
expounded by the ancient Greeks, but the Japanese must have also considered the
possibility. According to ancient Japanese folklore, to determine whether two
individuals were related, a drop of blood from each was permitted to fall into a
bowl of water. If the drops flowed together, they were relatives. (If you should
feel motivated to repeat this experiment, please let me know how it turns out!).
Unfortunately the idea of blood-based heredity was revived by Francis Galton,
who expanded it to develop eugenics, a concept which gained wide
popularity, only to cause enormous grief. Even today, those whose families
suffered the consequences of the proponents of eugenics understandably have
great difficulty in making objective assessments of the values of genetic
research.
From eugenics came such plans as the creation of a master race
and rationalization for the extermination of those whom they considered
inferior. It was not promoted by honest scientists, even though there were
so-called "scientific" publications extolling it. It was a deplorable outgrowth
of genetic research. Unfortunately, as scientific achievements proliferate,
human intellect does not keep pace, leading to serious abuses. Mankind is going
to have to struggle with the defining of socially acceptable uses of genetic
information even more than we have had to cope with defining useful and deadly
uses of atomic energy. Eugenics may be dormant, but like the flu, it will
reappear after having undergone subtle mutations.