Most family photograph albums include double portraits of male and
female adults. You may find that some are marked with names and dates
that help you place them in your family history. Whether the subjects
are identified or not, each image can tell a story or provide clues. In
addition to identifying the subjects in the pictures, researchers will
also want to find out when and where the photograph was taken and
uncover details about the events surrounding the image. Becoming your
family photo "Sherlock Holmes" is easy if you know what questions to ask
and where to look for clues.
Begin by taking the time to rediscover all the double portraits of
ancestral couples, friends, and siblings in your family photograph
albums. Before you start on this piece of detective work it is advisable
to don a pair of clean white cotton gloves for handling the pictures.
Have a magnifying glass on hand for discovering minute details. Keep a
worksheet or log describing each image so you can reference clues that
need additional research.
The first steps in your research involve finding out who is in the
photograph and when it was taken. While there are undoubtedly numerous
photos of relatives among your family photographs, there are probably
many images of friends, neighbors, and other associates as well. Be
especially careful with portraits found in albums as many young men and
women collected images of famous personalities. That distinguished
portrait you have been trying to identify may be of royalty from a
distant land or stage personalities of another era.
Contact
Relatives Show both identified and unidentified pictures to as many relatives
as possible. Doing so increases your chances of identifying that mystery
relative or finding out the story behind that funny picture of Aunt
Ethel wearing a party hat. You may be unfamiliar with a particular
image, but a relative, who could also have photos from the same event,
may be able to identify the subject(s) and recall some details. One
unknown picture could suddenly become significant as you discover it was
the wedding portrait of your great-great-grandparents. Take copies of
your photographs to every family event and show them off. You may learn
something new about the picture, no matter how old it is. You could also
try consulting a wider circle of relatives via the Internet by posting
an image online in a photo reunion site, family home page, or by asking
for help on a message board. Check Cyndi's
List under the category “Photographs and Memories” for a list of
photo reunion sites and try the larger surname message boards such as GenForum to find “lost” cousins.
Photographer’s
imprintYou will often find the name and address of the photographer printed
on the border or on the back of a portrait. This is a valuable clue
because it can place the image within a time frame. By consulting city
directories, you can trace the years a photographer was in business and
discover when they operated at a particular address. You might try
contacting a local historical society to see if they maintain files on
the photographers that worked in their area. The website of the
International Museum of Photography at George Eastman House in
Rochester, N.Y. has an online database of photographers that can be
useful, but the information is often incomplete. A better source is Photographers:
A Sourcebook for Historical Research, edited by Peter E. Palmquist
(Carl Mautz, 2001), which contains an annotated bibliography of
photographers around the world. You can then order their books or
articles through the interlibrary loan department of your public
library.
A Thread of EvidenceOne of the most important clues in a photograph is the clothing. The
shape of a woman’s sleeve, the cut of a man’s coat, or the selection of a
hat or other accessory can help you date an image within a few years.
Clothing can even tell you about the occasion for the portrait.

Unidentified subjects
From
the collection of Maureen Taylor
For instance, in the above portrait, the woman is wearing a veil and
holding hands with a man. Both the pose and the costume clues identify
it as a wedding portrait. Identifying wedding portraits as such can be
tricky since not every bride could afford to purchase a white dress to
wear just once. In addition, women’s magazines of certain eras suggested
that brides wear colored dresses instead of white to appear
fashionable. The woman pictured selected a very detailed dark-colored
dress decorated with elaborate patches of beading that she could later
remove. The style of her dress is consistent with women’s clothing of
the 1880s with center buttons and draped skirt on the side because of
the bustle. The best source of information on clothing in the nineteenth
century is Joan Severa’s Dressed for the Photographer: Ordinary
Americans & Fashion, 1840-1900 (Kent State University Press,
1995).
Are there props in the picture?Sometimes the simple details in a photograph provide clues. A woman
once told me that a handkerchief held by a couple signifies a deceased
child. While I have not been able to confirm that story, the presence of
flowers in nineteenth-century images usually was significant. Victorian
women studied books like The Language of Flowers and followed
directions about using blossoms as a
way to communicate. If you recognize a particular blossom in a
picture, you might discover something about the relationship between the
people in the portrait.

Unidentified subjects
From the collection of
Maureen Taylor
Props may provide clues or they may open up new mysteries. When
you look at the picture above of a couple holding onto a piece of paper,
what do you see? Is it a letter being passed from one to the other or
perhaps a marriage certificate? The pile of books on the back table may
signify an educated couple. Could the paper be a diploma? We will
probably never know, but it is fun to guess. Props ranged from a single
flower to an elaborate setting with furniture and a backdrop.
How are they posed?You may be able to determine the relationship between a man and a
woman in a photo by the way they are posed, but it is best not to rush
to conclusions. For instance, in the portrait of the young married
couple we see two individuals looking off into the distance rather than
at each other. They appear rather stiff and show none of the intimacy of
a newly married couple. If the woman wasn’t wearing a bridal veil and
holding hands with the man, you would have difficulty deciding the exact
nature of their relationship. Of course, just the experience of having a
picture taken made some people uneasy. Now reexamine the portrait of
the two people with the document. See how close they are standing. It is
unlikely that they were instructed to do so by the photographer. Their
body language indicates that they share close personal space either as a
married couple or as brother and sister.

Unidentified subjects
From
the collection of Maureen Taylor
Let us look at a third photograph for comparison. In this example,
taken around the turn of the twentieth century, a couple actually shares
a chair. The man is seated and the woman rests on the arm of the chair
with her arm intimately placed behind the man in uniform. This suggests
that they are married, engaged, or dating. On the other hand, it is
possible that they are relatives. This type of pose usually suggests a
close relationship and is fairly typical for the time period. As
individuals became more comfortable with the camera, photographers began
to imitate the candidness of amateur photographs and studio portraits
became more relaxed.
When was it taken? By talking with relatives, researching the clues presented in the
images, and reexamining the portraits for relevant details, you might
discover the picture is associated with a particular event. Part of what
makes each family photograph collection unique is the composition of
the collection. Different families take pictures of certain events and
ignore others. For instance, some collections are full of school
portraits, but lack baby and wedding pictures. Other people have series
of images related to religious occasions, such as baptisms and First
Communions. What families chose to document with photographs usually
indicated what was important to them and the role that photographs
played in the family. One family, for reasons unknown, collected a
significant number of post mortem images.
Most couples had their portrait taken when they became betrothed or
around the time of marriage and posed again when they reached a
significant anniversary. For example, this portrait of an older couple
taken in the 1890s suggests a special occasion. If this couple were
married in the 1840s, photography in the form of daguerreotypes was not
always available and convenient. But by the time of their fiftieth
anniversary in the 1890s, affordable portraits were available in most
locations, and they decided to have their picture taken.

Unidentified subjects
From
the collection of Maureen Taylor
Use Your GenealogyAs you make new discoveries about a single image, be sure to refer to
your family history for clues. Once you have compared all your photo
research on a portrait to your family history, you might find that you
have uncovered a long-lost portrait of someone on your family tree or
even found a picture of an “unknown” ancestor.
While this article concentrated on portraits of male/female couples,
there are of course pictures of pairs of men and women in family
collections. David Deitcher in Dear Friends: American Photographs of
Men Together, 1840-1918 (Harry N. Abrams, 2001) explores the
Victorian concept of friendship and how it was represented
photographically. Men and women developed close friendships and
expressed those relationships by exchanging keepsakes, letters, and
taking photographs together.
As you learn more about the pictures in your family, you will be
learning about your “missing” photographic heritage. Remember that
photographs are as important to your family history research as census
records and vital records. Besides, you might find out who you look
like!
All images property of the author.