Is there cancer in your family’s medical
pedigree? And if so, how are you going to find it? From death
certificates? Obituaries? Perhaps they will help, but death certificates
were established as public health documents, not for the enlightenment
of genealogists, so don’t get your hopes too high! It may take some real
detective work, but it’s certainly worth the try. So let’s get out your
family pedigree chart and see how we succeed. Let’s begin with the most
recent generations.
We know that cancer is a problem today in
all the developed countries around the world. Thanks to the National
Health Institute (NIH) and the American Cancer Society (ACS) we can
study the statistics, see the trends, and decide where to focus our
efforts. If you know of any cancers in the youngest generation, enter
them now. If there was a cancer death, be sure to record the date, of
course, but also keep a record of any “incidental” cancer cases -- those
which might have contributed to death or just be an incidental finding.
As one out of every four deaths in the United States is from cancer,
the odds are pretty strong that it won’t be long before you’ve noted
some cases. If you do, be sure to note the estimated date of ONSET, or
at least when it was first suspected or diagnosed.
Your best
source of information will probably be from any living relatives. It’s a
good idea to make a checklist, at least of the most common malignant
diseases, or how they might present, such as a lump in the breast,
rectal bleeding, a productive cough or perhaps urinary tract problems.
And don’t forget skin lesions, which are often obvious but might be
overlooked, and any disease which might have necessitated numerous blood
transfusions. The list may refresh someone’s memory about a relative’s
symptoms. Be sure to inquire whether the relative smoked or drank and,
of course, their geographical locations and their occupations.
What
should you look for? In males, 55% of invasive cancer cases are of the
prostate, lungs, and the colo-rectal areas. Prostate cancer accounts for
30% of new cancer cases in men. The three most common cancers in women
are breast, lung, and colorectal cancer. These figures, however, do not
include some other extremely common tumors: carcinoma in situ
(non-invasive cancer) of the uterine cervix and over a million basal and
squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. It’s also important to remember
that a family history of breast or ovarian cancer is just as important
on the paternal as on the maternal side.
Lung cancer has been the
leading cause of cancer deaths in women since 1987, when it surpassed
breast cancer. If you are a male, your lifetime probability of
developing cancer is 43 percent. In men under age 40, leukemia is the
most common fatal cancer; in older males it is cancer of the lung and
bronchus, followed by colorectal cancer.
It may surprise you to
learn that in children, cancer is the second leading cause of death
between ages 1-14 in the U.S., with accidents causing the most
fatalities. The diseases affecting children are much different than
those in adults; lymphocytic and other leukemias are the most common,
followed by tumors of the nervous system, lymphomas, soft-tissue lesions
and tumors of the kidneys.
Cancer in a Changing World
The
figures you read about adult cancer can be very misleading, however,
because cancer statistics change with each generation, reflecting
longevity, occupations, life styles, local environments, and even
susceptibility to other illness. Let’s start with longevity. We take it
for granted that most persons will live to age 70 or above today, with
females having a little edge over the males. But let’s look back a bit
and see how long your ancestors could have expected to live: (Ref. Table
1)
Table 1.
Years
of Life Expectancy, U.S.A.
| Year
|
All Races |
White |
Black |
| |
Male |
Female |
Male |
Female |
Male |
Female |
| 1850
|
|
|
38.3 |
40.5 |
|
|
| 1900 |
46.3 |
48.3 |
46.6 |
48.7 |
32.5 |
33.5 |
| 1950 |
65.6 |
71.1 |
66.5 |
72.7 |
59.1 |
62.9 |
*The 1850 figures are for Massachusetts only. 99% of
the measured population was white and the remaining 1% includes all
other races.
Pretty remarkable,
isn’t it?. Back in 1900, most people weren’t living long enough to
develop most of the cancers. And that’s still the case in many of the
undeveloped nations. When Project HOPE visited Indonesia in 1961, about
the only cancers were oral cancer from chewing betel nuts and
choriocarcinoma, which a very rare uterine tumor. Twenty-five years
later, people were still dying of malaria but cancer was beginning to
appear, because their average life span had lengthened. The same thing
happened earlier in the United States. Nutrition and public health
improved and the longevity increased remarkably, except around 1918,
when the deadly epidemic of influenza took its toll.
Cancer
arrived hand-in-hand with the industrial revolution. Although we are
interested in the genetic aspects, we should never underestimate the
influence of environment. Cancers have inscribed their own documentation
of human history. (Ref. Table 2)
Table
2.
Occupational, Recreational, and Nutritional Diseases
| Occupation |
Disease Predisposition |
| Chimney sweeps |
Scrotal cancer |
| Uranium mine workers |
Lung cancer from radioactive
dust |
| Tailors
analine |
Bladder
cancer from analine dyes |
| Leather tanners |
Testicular cancer |
| Watch makers |
Cancer from licking the radioactive
brushes used to paint radium on luminous dials |
| Clay pipe smokers |
Lip cancer |
| Sailors and farmers |
Skin cancers from over-exposure to
the sun, cataracts |
| Diet of salted and smoked food |
Gastric cancer |
| Chewing betel nuts |
Oral cancer |
| Mustard gas |
Lung cancer and DNA damage |
| Nickel miners and
smelters |
Carcinoma
of the larynx |
| Dry cleaners |
Perchloroethylene lung cancer |
| Asbestos workers who smoked |
Bronchial cancer and
mesotheliomas |
| Vinyl chloride workers |
Liver cancer |
| Marine electricians |
Asbestos-related lung cancer |
All you had to do was smoke while you were
working to increase your chances of dying from lung cancer -- or
bladder cancer. This is by no means a complete list of carcinogens, but
perhaps it suggests there is genetic influence, as well.
So far,
it appears that creating a medical genogram for cancer isn’t likely to
be too productive except for looking at the last couple of generations,
when cancer became more popular. We aren’t likely to discover many
inheritance patterns for malignant diseases by climbing up our family
tree. But there’s an important way a pedigree study can be of
significant value to current and future generations of your family. If
you have not already done so, you can verify your ethnicity. “Oh, I know
my ethnic background,” you insist.
Perhaps you do, because folks
weren’t too mobile back when to travel you either had to walk or ride a
horse or mule. Early New Englanders tended to marry whomever they
encountered in the next haystack But if you start counting, it may make
you wonder a bit. Four grandparents, but eight great-grandparents, and
then your forebears really begin to multiply: 16, 32, 64, 128, 256....
probability of a multi-ethnic pedigree is high. Are you sure they’re all
accounted for?
Importance
of Ethnicity to Cancer Genetics
When we examine various
types of cancer in the United States, predispostion based upon ethnicity
various considerably from one disease to another, but unfortunately for
African Americans, they have the highest incidence and mortality rates
for cancer. Theincidence rate is fully 60% higher than in Hispanics and
Asian/Pacific Islanders and double that for American Indians. The
overall cancer mortality rate for African Americans is 33% higher than
in Asian/Pacific Islanders, American Indians and Hispanics. But there
are exceptions, as breast and lung cancer death rates are higher in
whites than in African Americans. And certain cancers are more common in
Ashkenazi Jews.
These figures and those for other cancers need
very careful interpretation, of course, because there are numerous
non-genetic factors which contribute greatly to the discrepancies. Major
considerations include poverty, unavailability of health care for both
screening and treatment, language barriers, occupatins, diet and many
more.
Cancer Management
Because cancer
management, which involves prevention, screening and treatment, requires
such a large proportion of the effort and funding spent on health care
in the industrialized world, our knowledge of cancer genetics has grown
rapidly. All this research has begun to educate us about mutations
predisposing us to cancer, the various types of heritability, preventive
strategies, the importance of early diagnosis and the use of the most
appropriate therapy. Most of our knowledge is linked to specific tumors
and does not necessary apply to other types of cancer. Much of the
published work relates to the “common” cancers which attract the most
funding for research.
Genetic Predisposition to Cancer
Summaries
of our progress in understanding the genetic basis of cancer have been
published by Hyon Ju Kim and by M. Tevfik Dorak. Both refer to the “two
hit” concept of Dr. Albert Knudson, in which a dominantly inherited
susceptibility to cancer consists of the first hit, which is a germ line
mutation, but requires a second hit to somatic cells. According to this
hypothesis, sporadic cancer also requires two hits, but both would be
to somatic cells, so that a person carrying hereditary germ line
mutations would only require one more hit and thus be at risk to develop
a specific type of cancer.
In most cancers, the mode of
inheritance is complex, and cancer has been described as being a
multigenic, multifactorial, and multistep phenomenon. To this I would
add one more description, multiconfusion. Multigenic refers to the
variety of genes involved -- oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and MHC
genes. Multifactorial describes various factors that are involved with
cancer development; these include chemicals, hormones, viruses, diet,
radiation, etc. The multisteps in development of a cancer would be
transformation and promotion leading to overt cancer. Multiconfusion is,
of course, one of the end results.
Many tumors just appear in a
sporadic fashion, with no apparent inherited genetic abnormalities. In
about 5-10% of cancers there are mutations involving the germ line and
the cancer is familial in nature.
Long before the Human Genome
Project, physicians knew that our immune system had an important
influence on our susceptibility to cancer. When there are immune
deficiencies, there is increased cancer risk, especially for lymphoid
tumors. They had also identified tumor-specific T-lymphocytes which
could kill cells, or were cytotoxic (CTL), and tumor-infiltrating
lymphocytes (TIL). When tumor suppressor genes (MHC genes) become
impaired, or there is “loss of MHC expression,” cancer can develop.
Scientists had proposed the immune surveillance theory, in which
malignant changes can take place in normal cells but the immune system
removes these cells from the system.
Dominant Genetic
Imbalances in Cancer
Cancers occur when cell division goes
wild. The controls that usually control cell reproduction, such as
growth factors, cell surface receptors, enzymes, proteins, signaling
molecules, growth inhibiting factors, and others, no longer function in
an orderly manner. There are over 50 genes in the human genome,
proto-oncogenes, which are very similar to cancer-producing
retroviruses, or viral oncogenes. And they are inherited in a dominant
manner. What makes these proto-oncogenes go bezerk and act like
oncogenes?
A number of events can cause trigger this behavior and
turn them into what we might call psychogenes. The mechanisms are all
complex, but just listing them shows the diversity of the causes of
cancer. (Table 3)
Table 3
Diverse Cellular Mechanisms Causing Cancer
- Amplification -- takes place in
breast cancer, neuroblastomas
- Insertional
mutagenesis -- as caused by a virus in Burkitt’s lymphoma.
- Chromosomal translocations -- genes moving
around on their chromosomes
- Mutations
in genetic codings -- changes genetic activity, described as missense,
nonsense or frameshift types.
- Demethylation
or hypomethylation -- occurs in chronic lymphoid leukemia.
- Cyclins, genes involved in the control of cell
cycling, can become oncogenes when they have mutated
- Loss or inactivation of tumor suppressors
Tumor Suppressor Genes
These
are genes, inherited in a recessive manner, which usually act like
anti-oncogenes. As they are paired, you would expect that both copies of
tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) would have to be non-functional for
oncogensis to occur. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way. It’s more
like Animal Farm, where “all pigs are equal but some are more equal than
others.” The mutated anti-oncogenes are so strong they overwhelm the
normal allele and result in serious diseases.
Just having a bad
gene does not always insure the development of recognizable disease.
Environmental factors may be needed to promote the appearance of
symptoms. Geneticists also refer to another feature which is known as
penetrance. This is defined as the proportion of persons having a
specific genetic alteration who actually exhibit the associated trait.
High penetrance occurs in polyposis-associated colon cancer (nearly
100%) but lower penetrance in breast cancer developing in women having
the BRCA1 mutation, where it it occurs in about 60% of women by age 60.
Gatekeepers
and Caretakers
In recent years the genetic instigation and
control of cancer has been attributed to gatekeeper and caretaker genes,
a concept which has broad clinical and therapeutic implicaations. At
first, most cancer susceptibility genes were thought to be tumor
suppressor genes which directly controlled cell proliferation. Later it
was found that other genes indirectly predispose a person to cancer.
Gatekeeper
genes are those which directly regulate tumor cell growth or death.
Caretaker genes promote tumors indirectly by causing aberrations in
gatekeeper and other genes. Of course the mechanisms are quite
complicated, but it is important to identify just which genes are
involved in order to understand the cause, prognosis and eventually the
selection of treatment in a specific case. Genetic identification of a
person with a risk of cancer or perhaps early onset of cancer is aimed
at improving the quality of life. It’s not just in selection of therapy,
but enabling the patient to make better choices concerning family
planning, retirement or possible hospitalization. The risk assessment
includes family history, environmental factors, psychological effects,
possible hospitalization and economic concerns as well as the genetic
testing, and genetic counseling is definitely indicated.
How
Valid is the Testing?
All of the evidence being used to
make the diagnosis of cancer should be evaluated in several ways. This
applies, of course, to every laboratory procedure, even if genetic
testing is not performed or perhaps, under the circumstances, not even
considered.No test is perfect and errors do occur; some positive or
suspicious results with “screening” procedures need to be followed up
with other, more specific approaches. The National Cancer Institute
recommends that genetic tests be evaluated for analytic validity,
clinical validity, and clinicl utility.
Analytic validity refers
to the technical accuracy and reliablity of a test, which would include
the methodology, lab techniques and how specimens were obtained and
handled. Some methods are more sensitive than others but sometimes they
are more prone to error, e.g., they are not so specific. In genetic
testing, it may be necessary to find a particular set of mutations by
means of sequencing tests in which the sensitivity and specificity
depends upon methodology, the proportion of the gene tested and the
nature of the aberrations present in the gene.
The clinical
validity tells you how valuable the test will be for predicting the
outcome in the patient. What is the likelihood that cancer will develop
if a test were “positive”? This may involve weighing the test results
along with the influence of environment or personal behavior. And as we
have seen, even ethnicity may play a role, along with linkage studies
and the presence or absence of a family history of the disease.
Finally,
the clinical utility is the consideration of just how much can be
accomplished to modify the cancer or cure the patient based upon the
results of testing. Depending upon when testing was done, the strategies
include screening to detect early or precancerous lesions, surgical or
other intervention to reduce the risk, or measures just to improve the
quality of life.
New Hope from New Uses
Other
important uses of genetic testing that are just evolving but offer new
hope. As well as being of predictive value, the data obtained is used to
select therapy, possibly aiming the treatment towards the specific
genetic aberration rather than the broad “shot-gun” approach that was
previously required, making it more efficient and far less stressful to
the patient. Or in some cases it will make it possible to to select best
choice from the available types of treatment.
Tumor angiogenesis
is also of prime interest, because cancers depend on the development of
a blood supply for growth, invasion and metastasis throughout the body.
Scientists are seeking ways to prevent tumors from growing by
inhibiting their ability to stimulate vascularization of surrounding
tissues.
Microarray analysis is now being used to study tumors
and predict how they will behave. Recognizable patterns, known as gene
expression profiles, have been found to correlate with a number of
primary or metastatic tumors, including those arising in the breast,
colon, lung, ovary, prostate and metastatic prostatic tissue. Marker
genes may prove useful both for prognosis and treatment purposes.
GENETIC
COUNSELING
We’ve referred so much to the importance of
genetic counseling, perhaps we should provide you with its definition,
as published by the American Society of Human Genetics:
“A
communication process which deals with the human problems associated
with the occurrence or risk of occurrence of a genetic disorder in a
family. The process involves an attempt by one or more appropriately
trained persons to help the individual or family to: 1) comprehend the
medical facts, including the diagnosis, probable course of the disorder,
and the available management; 2) appreciate the way that heredity
contributes to the disorder and to the risk of recurrence in specific
relatives; 3) understand the alternatives for dealing with the risk of
recurrence; 4) choose a course of action which seems to them appropriate
in view of their risk, their family goals, and their ethical and
religious standards and act in accordance with that decision; and 5)
make the best possible adjustment to the disorder in an affected family
member.”
IF YOU FIND YOU ARE AT RISK
If you
feel you might have inherited genes putting you at risk for cancer, you
should first consult your physician and/or a genetic counselor.
If
a living close relative has a known type of cancer, he or she should
have genetic counseling so the genetic pattern can be recorded for the
benefit of other family members and future generations. Also, it would
be advisable to bank some DNA from this person for future studies when
needed. But even if a relative doesn’t have one of the high-risk genetic
variants, if there is a strong family history of cancer, the risk is
still statistically high in close relatives and careful surveillance is
important. It is almost certain that all the genes associated with any
cancer have not yet been found.
Of course, we have only provided
an introduction to cancer genetics. This is because the literature is
voluminous and ever-changing, with valuable new information arriving all
of the time. The following malignant diseases have received the lion’s
share of the research efforts: bladder, breast, cervix, colorectal,
endometrial, esophageal, kidney, liver, lung & bronchus, lymphomas,
melanoma, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate and stomach. We have include
pertinent references on these subjects. Web sites exist for all of
these, and because of the massive amount of research, they require
continual updating. The reader will undoubtedly find that time and
effort spent researching family medical history will be most productive
by revealing cancer risks and probabilities for the entire family and
enabling the planning of appropriate strategies.
BLADDER CANCER
Cancer of the
urinary bladder is most common in industrialized countries; rates in
Asia and South America are only 30 percent of those in the United
States. Mortality rates are 2-3 times higher in men than in women. There
is a definite risk to people working with chemicals known as
arylamines, and cigarette smoking increase the risk for bladder cancer
by 2-5 times. The disease primarily affects older individuals. The
highest rates are in white male and female non-Hispanics, but no
specific genetic links have been reported to date.
BREAST
CANCER
Breast cancer is far more prevalent in females, and
for this reason, most of the scientific literature and research is based
upon diagnosing and treating women. But it also can occur in males,
often with aggressive behavior and very serious consequences. Also, it
would be more correct to speak of breast “cancers” in women, because
there are different varieties and their clinical courses can very
dissimilar. Breast cancers are second only to non-melanoma skin cancers
in women, with an estimated 211,240 new cases predicted for 2005.
They
will also cause 40,410 female deaths and 470 male deaths in the US
(Amer. Cancer Soc.). A woman’s risk of developing breast cancer
conferred by a first-degree relative is 2.1. The younger the relative
was when diagnosed, the higher the risk to her first degree relative,
especially if it occurred before age 50. The number of affected
relatives and the closeness of biological family relationship are also
significant in determining the risk. Linkage analysis studies of
families have proved there is an autosomal dominant type of breast
cancer that occurs in 5-10 percent of cases. Some highly penetrant genes
are present in cancer-prone families.
NON-GENETIC
FACTORS
As is true with many cancers, the breast lesions
result from a combination of genetic and so-called “environmental”
factors, and in this case, some of the environmental factors play very
significant roles. At particular risk are women with a history of
pre-menopausal breast cancer in the mother or a sister, a previous
personal history of breast cancer or benign poliferative breast disease.
Very likely under genetic influence are the high risks for cancer
present in women having an early onset of menstruation (especially if
before age 12) or those experiencing a late menopause (age 55 or older).
Prolonged use of birth control pills and failure to deliver a baby by
age 30 seem to be related, and post-menopausal use of estrogens may
increase risk slightly. Other possible related causes, still being
studied, are obesity and high alcohol consumption.
GENETIC
FINDINGS
Much of the research on breast cancer has focused
on mutations either in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. The BRCA1 gene is on
chromosome 17, the BRCA2 gene on chromosome 13. There are a couple of
hundred variant alleles for BRCA2, and twice as many for BRCA1, but only
some of them are related to breast cancer. Inheritance of any of these
cancer-susceptiblity genes confers a lifetime risk of breast cancer of
50 to 85 percent, plus a significant risk of ovarian cancer.
Although
the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations contribute to but a small percentage of
all the cases of breast cancer, about 10 percent of breast cancer in
women under age 40 and 75 percent of familial cases occur in women
carrying these mutations. For this reason, some women having these genes
have undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomies. This difficult
decision is controversial, because of the personal effects of the
surgery, the fact that all carriers do not develop breast cancer and
that it is possible to treat breast cancer successfully if detected
early. It appears that a better argument has been made for prophylactic
bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in these patients (see discussion of
ovarian cancer).
High-risk variants are more common in certain
populations. They are found in 2.5 percent of Ashkenazi Jews and cause
over a quarter of the breast cancers before age 40 in that ethnic group.
In the general population, though, these high-risk variants
areuncommon, being found in less than 0.5 percent and being associated
with 5 to 10 percent of all breast cancer. The ATM gene on chromosome 11
is also under suspicion and being studied.
The characteristics
of the breast cancer differ in these two types of mutations. In the
BRCA1 cases, the tumors are “high grade” with many mitoses (indicating
active cell division). The tumors have smooth margins and are
infiltrated with lymphoytes. BRCA2 tumors can also be “high grade,” and
don’t tend to form tubules. There are also special stains and tests that
help distinguish the two, but now it is also possible to use
high-density microarray technology.
Dr. N. Rahmen, at the
Institute of Cancer Research in Surrey, United Kingdom, recently
reported that the checkpoint kinase gene, CHEK2, is also associated with
a high risk of breast cancer in both females and males. This gene acts
in the same pathways as BRCA1 and BRCA2. Also, a new methodology has
been used to detect the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. It is allele-specific
gene expression (AGE) analysis and it uses decay in the cells’ own RNA
surveillance mechanism to pick out carriers of these mutations.
USING
GENES FOR PROGNOSIS
Of particular interest are studies
being done to recognize the degree of risk presented by a breast tumor
so that the most appropriate treatment can be used to control the
disease. Traditional methods have been the uses of “frozen sections” of a
tumor during surgery so that the pathologist can grade the tumor, and
similar microscopic examinations of slides containing sections of
suspicious regional lymph nodes. These provide valuable information to
the surgeon which helps in making decisions about the extent of surgery
necessary. The preserved tissues are later evaluated much more
thoroughly in a systematic manner before deciding upon the need for
chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. These adjuvant treatment methods
reduce the risk of distant metastases by about one-third, but a high
percentage of patients receiving this treatment would have survived
without it.
Investigators in The Netherlands used DNA microarray
analysis on breast tumors of 117 young patients and state they have
come up with a gene expression profile that can be used to predict the
behavior of the cancer.
The investigators used genes regulating
cell duplication, invasion, metastasis and small blood vessel formation
to indentify patients with poor prognosis and who would benefit most
from the adjuvant treatment with hormonal or chemotherapy. Finnish
researchers have also reported finding another means of identifying
breast tumors having poor prognosis -- they found elevated
cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) increases associated with poor survival. So far
we could find no reported break-throughs which might lead to
gene-specific tailored methods of therapy, but keep looking, because it
isn’t because nobody’s looking for one!
Because so many of breast
cancer patients develop tumor resistance to current treatments,
scientists are searching for new gene-targeted therapies that are both
tumor-specific and well tolerated by the patient. Herceptin is one of
the new agents which can be combined with other methods and seems
particularly effective in patients with human epidermal-growth-factor
receptor (HER2) gene amplification or high overexpression of HER2.
Pathologists can detect HER2 protein in samples of breast tissue so that
Herceptin can be used in appropriate cases. Other similar agents will
eventually improve survival rates and the quality of life of cancer
patients.
FINDING IF YOU ARE AT RISK
If you
have worries about having inherited genes that might put you at risk for
cancer, you should first consult your physician and/or a genetic
counselor. If someone in the family has breast cancer, she should have
genetic testing so that her genetic pattern is recorded. Also, it would
be advisable to bank some DNA for future studies when needed. But even
if a relative doesn’t have one or more of the high-risk variants of the
BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, if there is a strong family history of cancer, the
risk is still statistically high in close relatives and careful
surveillance is important. It is very probable that all of the genes
associated with breast cancer have not yet been found.
CERVICAL
CANCER
Thanks to Dr.George Papanicolaou, most cancers of
the uterine cervix are now discovered in a very early stage in the
United States, before they have become invasive. Risk factors for
cervical cancer include early sexual activity, multiple sexual
partners,cigarette smoking and infection with human papilloma virus 16.
There
are strong ethnic patterns which suggest a genetic susceptibility, but
more research is needed in this area. The highest incidence is in
Vietnamese women (43/100,000), and the lowest in Japanese women
(5.8/100,000).
Incidence rates exceeding 15/100,000 are found in
Alaska Native, Korean and Hispanic women in the United States.
COLORECTAL
CANCER
colon and the rectum, which comprise the lower
portion of the gastrointestinal tract, are host to a variety of tumors
which add up to the fourth most common cancers and are second in causing
cancer deaths in the United States. There are marked ethnic differences
in susceptibility. The highest ethnic rates in males in the U.S. are in
the Alaskan Native population, followed in decreasing order by
Japanese, African-Americans and whites, Chinese, Hawaiians and
Hispanics, Filipinos, Koreans and Vietnamese. In females colo-rectal
cancer is also most common in Alaskan Natives, followed by
African-Americans, Japanese, whites, Chinese, Hawaiians, Vietnamese,
Hispanics, Koreans and Filipinos. In each ethnic group the incidence
rates for men is higher than that for women, but the ratio is highest
among Japanese and Filipinos. Colon cancer is generally more common than
rectal cancer in all of the ethnic groups, with about 95,000 cases of
colon cancer diagnosed annually in comparison with 35,000 cases of
rectal cancer. Colorectal cancer begins to appear after age 40 and peaks
between ages 60 and 75, causing about 55,000 deaths each year. There
are even statistics showing the incidence of colon cancer by ZIP code in
parts of New York State. (www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh)
ENVIRONMENTAL
EFFECTS
Environmental effects are very important in the
development of colo-rectal cancer and they no doubt are reflected to a
great extent in the variable ethnicity. Diets high in animal fat and
sugar have been implicated, plus a sedentary life style, alcoholic
intake and the use of tobacco. For a long time it was believed that
high-fiber diets protected against the development of colonic cancer,
but this has been questioned. There is evidence that diets high in
calcium vitamin D plus leafy vegetables such as Brussel sprouts,
broccoli, cabbage and turnip greens reduce the risk of colonic cancer.
Three inflammatory diseases predispose to the develop of cancer --
ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and chronic diverticulitis of the
colon.
MULTIPLE POLYPOSIS OF COLON
A
hereditary condition which almost invariably leads to colo-rectal cancer
by age 40 is familial adenomatosis polyposis, which also goes under the
names of adenomatous polyposis of the colon, multiple polyposis coli,
or familial multiple polyposis. And if that doesn’t make it confusing
enough, there are at least nine disorder subdivisions, including Gardner
syndrome and Turcot syndrome. The APC gene, located on chromosome 5, is
atypical in these neoplasms. Familial adenomatous polyposis is
inherited as an autosomal dominant trait.
GENES
CONTRIBUTING TO SUSCEPTIBILITY
FAP genes Mutations in these
genes result in the FAP syndrome, in which hundreds or even thousands of
polyps develop in the mucosal linings of the colon and rectum. Each one
has the potential of becoming malignant, and by age 40, cancer develops
in nearly every case. This process is associated with the previously
mentioned APC gene.
HNPCC genes Four of the HNPCC genes cause the
HNPCC syndrome, which occurs in various forms and can include cancers
in the breast, ovaries, small bowel, stomach and uterus. They are hMSH2
on chromosome 2, hMLH1 on chromosome 3, hPMS1 on chromosome 2 and hPMS2
on chromosome 7. Persons with HNPCC often develop colon cancer before
age 50 and may have a family history of colorectal cancer.
Other
genes Ninety percent of colorectal cancer is caused by other genes, some
of which have combined effects but which are weaker than those of the
FAP and HNPCC genes. Some of these genes are involved with the
inflammatory bowel diseases which can later be associated with cancer.
There are ethnic predispositions for these diseases, as they are most
common among whites and especially persons with Ashkenazi Jewish
heritage. In 1997, researchers at Johns Hopkins reported the APCI1307K
mutation on the same gene that carries FAP; this mutation is not a
direct cause of colon cancer but makes the gene susceptible to other
changes which do cause the cancer. According to their findings, the
types of colorectal cancer in Ashkenazi Jews occur as follows:
Table 4
Colorectal Cancer in
Ashkenazi Jews
| Cancer Types |
Percentages |
| Sporadic (not hereditary) |
50-85% |
| Familial |
10-30% |
| APCI1307K |
10% |
| Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal
Cancer |
4-5% |
| Familial
Adenomatous Polyposis |
>1% |
DEALING WITH COLORECTAL CANCER
The
American Cancer Society and the American Gastroenterological
Association have made recommendations for colon cancer screening. These
are only guidelines and you should consult your physician about what
screening program is most suitable for you.(Ref. Table 5)
Table 5
Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs
Persons 50 years or older; no known risks factor for
colorectal cancer
Fecal occult blood screening every year
AND
Flexible
sigmoidoscopy every 5 years
OR
Double contrast barium
enema every 5-10 years
or
Colonoscopy every 10 years
Persons
with Close Relatives who have had Colorectal Cancer or Polyps
Same
as above but starting by age 40
Persons with History of
Adenomatous Polyps
Colonoscopy 3 years after removal of a polyp,
unless shorter interval is recommended. The interval would be based upon
the type, size and number of polyps found. (Note: For a benign polyp to
become malignant usually takes 10 years.)
Persons with History
of Colorectal Cancer
Colonic surgery for colorectal cancer should
have a colonoscopy within 1 year after surgery. If this is normal, is
should be repeated again in 3 years; if normal, repeat every 5 years
thereafter.
Comments: The annual occult blood screening test, in
which 3 stool samples are submitted, is the most cost-efficient method
of screening. Colonoscopy is by far the best of the above methods for
finding colorectal polyps or early cancer. Sigmoidoscopy can only
examine the distal, or lower portion of the colon, and cannot locate
polyps or other lesions farther up in the colon. Colonoscopy has been
found statistically better than barium enemas for finding colonic
cancer. Because sigmoidoscopy can be done without general anesthesia, it
is much more readily available and far less expensive, making it the
choice of most insurance programs. These options should be discussed
with your own physician.
TREATMENT AND SURVIVAL: GENETIC
AIDS
The primary treatment of colorectal cancer is surgical,
depending upon the site, the degree of local invasion and the spread to
regional lymph nodes or other parts of the body. These factors are
expressed in stages, e.g., Duke’s stage A, B or C. Adjuvant chemotherapy
improves survival among patients with Duke’s Stage C (also known as
stage III) and is sometimes considered for patients with Duke’s Stage B
(or stage II). Investigators at a number of medical schools have now
identified genetic and molecular alterations which can be used to
predict survival after chemotherapy. This information should aid in the
development and use of more effective means of supplementing the
surgical procedures.
ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
The
ethnic occurrence of endometrial cancer in the U.S. has a pattern
similar to that of breast cancer, with the highest age-adjusted
incidence in Hawaiians, Whites, Japanese and Afican Americans. Lowest
rates are in Korean, Vietnamese and American Indian women. Obesity is a
risk factor. The postmenopausal use of exogenous estrogens is also a
risk factor, but the risk is considerably reduced when they are taken
with progesterone.
ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
Cancer
of the esophagus is more common in Asia, Africa and Latin American than
in the United States. It is primarily a disease of men, and it occurs in
different forms. Most cancers of the esophagus were once of the
squamous cell variety (similar to the cells of your skin). Recently
there has been an increase of a glandular cell type, called
adenocarcinomas, especially involving Caucasian males. The squamous type
has its highest incidence in African Americans (15/100,000) and the
lowest rate in Filipinos (2.9/100,000). Rates are also low in Chinese
and Japanese men.
Environmental factors include smoking tobacco
and heavy alcohol consumption, plus possible nutritional deficiencies in
developing countries. There is no convincing evidence of genetic
predisposition.
KIDNEY CANCER
Kidneys are
complex organs and have the capability of developing various types of
benign and malignant tumors. Children can develop a Wilm’s tumor, also
known as nephroblastoma, embryoma or adenomyosarcoma. It is a mixture of
stromal cells, spindle cells and epithelial cells. The most common
pediatric tumor of kidneys, it makes up 5-6 percent of pediatric cancer
in the U.S., affecting 8.1 million white children. It can be unilateral
or bilateral.
Wilm’s tumor can be accompanied by a number of
other inherited syndromes. It is sometimes linked to paternal exposure
to lead or hydrocarbons. However, its genetic basis is well documented.
The WT-1 gene involves chromosome 11p1310 exons, 4mRNA’s and 1 protein,
apparently a classic tumor suppressor. The genes targeted are unknown,
but the predisposition is inherited as a dominant negative oncogene.
Other Wilm’s genes include WT-2 gene and Familial WT. About 85 percent
of cases can be cured, although this is a high incidence of secondary
tumors in irradiated areas.
Adult renal cancer includes that
from renal cells in the body of the kidney and from the lining cells of
the renal pelvis, which funnels the urine into the bladder via the
ureter. Men are affected about twice as often as women. The highest
rates are in American Indian men in New Mexico. Rates in Afican
Americans, Hispanics and Caucasians range from 10-13/100,000 for men and
about 6,100,000 in women. Lowest rates are found in Asian populations.
The only established risk is from cigarette smoking.
A research
team found a genetic link to clear cell carcinoma of the kidney in 1994;
this variety causes about 85 percent of the adult renal cancer,
amounting to about 23,500 cases per year. The mutant is a tumor
suppressor gene located on the short arm of chromosome 3. The protein
produced by this gene normally restrains growth. Both copies of this
gene have to be damaged (two-hit model) for cancer to develop. This same
gene plays a major role in an inherited cancer syndrome, von
Hippel-Lindau disease. Persons with this disease can develop multiple
tumors, including cancers of the kidney, eye, brain, spinal cord and
adrenal glands.
LIVER CANCER
Cancers of the
liver and intrahepatic bile ducts are most common in regions of Africa
and Asia, accounting for only 1.5 percent of cancer cases in the United
States. Because they are not diagnosed early, the five-year survival
rates are less than 10 percent. The highest incidence rate is in
Vietnamese men (41.8 per 100,000), and their are high rates in Chinese
and other Asian-American populations. There is association with viral B
hepatitis.
LUNG AND BRONCHUS CANCER
Lung
cancer (which includes cancer arising in the bronchial tree) is the
second most common cancer among men and women in the United States and
the leading cause of death. Ethnic rates vary widely, from a high of
117/100,000 in African American males to a low of 14/100,000 in American
Indian males. Rates for male Vietnamese, Caucasians, Alaska natives and
Hawaiians are high, from 71-89/100,000. Among women, the highest rate
is 51/100,000 in Alaska Natives, the low 15 /100,000 in Japanese.
Smoking puts all groups at significant risk, and is blamed for 90 of all
lung cancers. Asbestos exposure is another known cause, as is radon
exposure.
Genetic research is being done on lung cancers --
researchers are finding the genetic patterns are likely to be complex.
There are four common types of lung cancer: squamous cell,
adenocarcinoma, large cell and small cell. Even with adenocarcinomas,
tumors which appear histologically similar respond quite differently to
treatment. Dr. David Botstein and researchers at Stanford University
have been using RNA from samples of normal lungs and lung tumors to
identify suspicious genes. They were able to identify 3 subtypes of
adenocarcinomas in which the patients had differing survival patterns
and are continuing the studies in the hope of finding ways of targeting
lung cancers with the most appropriate treatment. At the Medical College
of Wisconsin, Dr. Steven Ahrendt and his colleagues are using bronchial
washings to collect cancer cells for DNA studies. They report finding
numerous different mutations in these cells, but more studies will be
needed to obtain data that would aid in making an early diagnosis for a
specific type of cancer.
Polymorphisms in the p53 gene, found in
nearly 30 percent of African Americans in an Anderson Cancer Center
study reported by D. I. Amos, were associated with an increased risk for
lung cancer. The mechanisms for how these polymorphisms work are still
under investigation.
Bronchial epithelium undergoes a number of
changes when it becomes malignant. Most obvious are the abnormalities in
the epithelial cells, which become dysplastic, with irregular shapes
and enlarged, deeply staining nuclei. These cells begin to proliferate
at an abnormally rapid rate. There is also atypical proliferation of
tiny vascular channels, known as angiogenesis, and there are significant
changes in proteins on the cell surfaces. One family of proteins, the
epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR), become “overexpressed” in
nearly all squamous cell carcinomas and in most of the large cell and
adenocarcinomas. Only the small cell tumors fail to express EGFR.
Overexpression
of EGFR is a consistent finding in the bronchial lining cells of
high-risk smokers. Research is currently being conducted to see how EGFR
information might contribute to chemoprevention or targeted lung cancer
treatment.
LYMPHOMAS
Lymphomas are generally
divided into Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s types; the more common
non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) will be discussed here, but its worth
noting that together these lymphomas are the fifth most common type of
cancer diagnosed in the U.S.A. The risk of developing NHL is increased
by:
Exposure to human T-lymphotrophic virus type I
Exposure
to Epstein-Barr (EBV) virus
Infection of the gastrointestinal tract
with Helicobacter pylori
Infection with human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV)
Malarial infection
Persons with weakened immune systems
are susceptible to NHL. It is most common in non-Hispanic white males
and the rate is particularly high in some Jewish populations in whom
there is genetic predisposition for the disease.
Genetic research
on lymphomas is moving ahead, as researchers monitor changes in gene
expression profiles associated with the multiple varieties, including
Burkitt’s lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, diffuse
large cell lymphoma and B-cell lymphoma. Translocations have been found
which disrupt normal gene sequencing and result in activation of
oncogenes.
MELANOMA
Skin cancers, especially
those of basal cell and squamous cell type, cause an estimated 40
percent of all cancers in the United States, but most fatalities from
skin cancer are caused by malignant melanomas.
Table 6.
Melanoma
in the United States
(Ref.: American Cancer Society)
2005
Estimates
| New Cases |
59,600 |
| Deaths per year |
7,800 |
| Survival Rate, localized lesion |
91% |
| “ “, regional spread |
60% |
| “ “, distant spread |
14% |
Melanoma is a common cancer in young adults, particularly
affecting whites with fair skin who have blond or red hair and who
sunburn and freckle readily. The world’s highest incidence is in
Australia. Melanomas are rare in African Americans and Asians and often
occur in locations unexposed to the sun, such as nail beds or the soles
of the feet. Persons suffering from xeroderma pigmentosum, a group of
diseases in which the patients are especially susceptible to ultraviolet
radiation, are greatly at risk to develop skin lesions, especially
melanoma.
Although most skin cancers are associated with the
total cumulative exposure to ultraviolet radiation, melanomas do not
usually appear in those areas, but are associated with intense
intermittent exposure. Basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas are found
on the face, backs of hands and forearms, where there may have been
almost daily exposure to the sun. Melanomas occur most often on the
backs of men and lower legs of women.
A family history of
melanoma can mean significant risk for the disease, the more relatives
with melanoma, the higher the risk. About 8-12 percent of malignant
melanomas occur in persons with a familial predisposition. Loci on
chromosomes 1p and 9p are said by Goldstein and Tucker at the National
Cancer Institute to be implicated with susceptibility for melanomas.
Other investigators describe two genes in which an inherited mutation
can contribute to the development of melanoma. One is CDKN2A, located on
the short (p) arm of chromosome 9 at 9p21. It codes for proteins which
help control cell growth and division. Mutations of this gene have been
found in 20-40 percent of families with 3 or more affected first-degree
relatives. A second gene, CDK4, is located on the long (q) arm of
chromosome 12. A report from deCODE Genetics states that mutation in the
p16 gene which encodes for a protein may be responsible for melanoma in
some families. And BRCA2 germline mutations were found by the Breast
Cancer Consortium to be related to increased occurrence of melanomas.
Myriad
Genetics announced a predictive test for malignant melanomas in late
2001. This test is based upon mutations in the p16 gene, which occur in
melanoma but have also been reported in many other malignant diseases,
such as leukemia, breast, bone, brain and ovarian cancers. Just how
specific these mutations are for melanomas is not clear. Together with
careful family history and clinical evaluation, the test could be of
value, but interpretation and medical management will be complex should
be carefully supervised and professionally guided.
Therapy of
melanomas is a challenging matter. In early staged disease, surgical
procedures can potentially cure up to 90 percent of cases. Where there
are metastases to regional lymph nodes or distant parts of the body,
survival rates are difficult to predict and dependent upon many variable
factors. Available treatments include chemotherapy, biologic therapy,
tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, lymphokine-activated cells, interferon,
and various combinations. A number of immunotherapeutic methods are
currently being evaluated at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa,
Florida.
OVARIAN CANCER
Ovarian cancer rates
fifth in frequency among women in the United States. It is difficult to
diagnose, so far impossible to prevent. The mortality rate is highest
among white women, followed by Hawaiian women and African American
women. There is an inverse ratio between parity and ovarian cancer. The
lifetime risk for developing ovarian cancer is about 1/70, and the
greatest single risk factor is a family history of the disease. The odds
ratio for a woman with a single first-degree relative with ovarian
cancer is stated to be 3.1, and it is 4.6 for a woman with 2 or 3
relatives with ovarian cancer. Prolonged use of oral contraceptives has
been found to be protective against ovarian cancer.
Hereditary
ovarian cancer is transmitted via BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations in an
autosomal dominant pattern. Inheritance of either of these mutants
confers a lifetime risk of ovarian cancer of 50 to 85 percent. 94
percent of BRCA-1 ovarian cancers are of the serous cell type, as
compared with 60 percent of sporadic ovarian carcinomas. There are also
mutations of p53 and PTEN which can produce syndromes which include
ovarian cancer and it is also associated with a basal cell nevus (Gorlin
syndrome), with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and with
hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). The autosomal dominant
inheritance produce a vertical transmission pattern in a genogram, with a
50 percent risk of inheritance from a carrier parent.
The
reports by N. D. Kauff et al. and T. R. Rebbeck et al. on the results of
bilateral salpingo-oophorectomieson women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations
are quite convincing evidence of the effectiveness of this method of
preventing the development of ovarian carcinoma, or at least excising it
while it is in its early stages Ovarian cancer is much harder to
diagnose and often has spread by the time there is surgical
intervention. Also, prophylactic oophorectomy reduces the risk of breast
cancer by about half in carriers of BRCA mutations. Genetic counseling
is definitely indicated, but both reports support the practice of
recommending prophylactic oophorectomy after the completion of
childbearing for women carrying a mutant BRCA gene. There are other
smaller studies in which other investigators reached similar
conclusions.
PANCREATIC CANCER
Cancer of the
pancreas accounts for 2 percent of cancers each year, but because it
can rarely diagnosed early, causes 5 percent of cancer deaths. The most
common variety is adenocarcinoma, which arises from pancreatic ducts,
but because symptoms don’t appear until late, the disease is usually far
advanced when the diagnosis is confirmed. Other types of pancreatic
cancer, arising from the insulin-producing islet cells or the
enzyme-producing acinar cells, are quite rare.
Pancreatic cancer
usually occurs after age 55, with the mean age at time of diagnosis of
63 years, more often affects males, and is more common in African
Americans than whites. Cigarette smoking seems to increase the risk;
other possible risk factors include a folate-deficient diet, diabetes
and exposure to carcinogens.
About 10 percent of patients have a
first-degree relative with the disease. At risk are persons with
familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome, persons
carring the BRCA2 mutant gene, and those having hereditary non-polyposis
colon cancer (HNPCC). Of these, the most common are the cases
associated with BRCA2 mutations (5-10 percent of pancreatic
adenocarcinomas). These cases do not appear any earlier in life than
those of sporadic origin, suggesting that the mutations have a low
penetrance and that other factors, such as environmental causes, are
also involved in the development of cancer.
PROSTATE
CANCER
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer
diagnosed in the United States, with over 100,000 cases reported
annually. However, these figures are very misleading, because just as
many cases are NOT diagnosed. Small islands of malignant cells can be
found within the prostate gland in 50 percent of men over age 70 and in
nearly every man who lives 10-20 years longer. These lesions generally
remain localized over many years. They do not enlarge the prostate and
most go unnoticed unless a prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) test is
performed. The introduction of PSA testing in 1987 was followed by a
huge increase in the reported incidence of prostate cancer in the United
States. As of 2001, the lifetime risk of a diagnosis of prostate cancer
had risen to around 16 percent, but the lifetime risk of death from
prostate cancer was only 3.4 percent.
PSA-DYNIA
PSA
testing can be credited with finding many prostate cancers in younger
men which could be followed up with needle biopsies of the gland. Hot
debates raged over the ideal number and pattern for the biopsies, but
with the usual six samples, at least 10 percent of the tumors are
missed. In the successful cases, the pathologist can evaluate the
histologic patterns and estimate the aggressiveness of the lesion. The
PSA test could also be very misleading, owing to false negative or false
positive results. False positive results can result from (among other
things) prior surgical procedures, acute prostatitis, urinary retention
and digital rectal examination immediately prior to the PSA testing.
Artificial “normal” ranges were proposed for various age groups, but
over-reliance upon this test resulted in chronic states of anxiety in
many patients, a false sense of well-being in others, and enormous
expenditures of time and money seeking to explain the results. The
amount of “surgical overkill” that followed has never been documented.
Measurements of free PSA or PSA complexes seem to be helpful because
elevated circulating free PSA is associated with benign hyperplasia
rather than malignancy. Dr. Arul Chinnaiyan and colleagues at the
University of Michigan identified 2 genetic markers in 2001, hepsin and
pim-1, which may prove useful in improving PSA specificity and possibly
become therapeutic targets. The American College of Physicians, and
other professional organizations, do not recommend routine use of the
PSA test in men age 70 or over, but suggest making decisions on an
individual basis after discussion of the pros and cons with the patient.
Environmental
factors involved with prostate cancer include diets high in saturated
fat. Male hormones are related also, but more studies are needed to
determine their specific effects. Some foods, e.g., tomatoes, and some
vitamins and minerals are possibly protective, but evidence is
inconclusive.
PROSTATE CANCER GENETICS
The
role of genetics in prostate cancer seems to be dominant in about 10
percent of the cases; those cases are the ones appearing at a younger
age and are likely to be more aggressive and deadly. Some of the
recognized genes contributing to susceptibility are listed in Table ___,
but they are not all equally involved and there are undoubtedly more!
Others which seem directly involved in the malignant transformation of
cells include MXI1 gene on chromosome 10, KAI1 gene on chromosome 11 and
the PTEN gene on chromosome 10.
Table 7.
Genes Increasing Susceptibility to
Cancer of the Prostate
| Gene |
Chromosome |
Comment |
| HPC1 |
1 |
Believed to account for 9% of prostate cancer. Not
precisely identified as yet. |
| HPC2 |
1 |
Similar to HPC1, but at a different locus. Its
existence is also questioned. |
| HPCX |
X |
Accounts for 1/6 of hereditary prostate cancer* |
| androgen |
X |
Associated with aggressive
prostatic receptor cancer |
| ELAC2 |
? |
Estimated to affect 2-5% of cancer cases |
| PCBC |
1 (?) |
Associated with brain cancer |
*Explains why a man is at higher risk if a
brother has prostatic cancer than if his father has the disease. As in
the case of a number of other cancers, the epidermal growth-factor
receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase family in tumor cells is being targeted
by monoclonal antibodies in clinical trials in patients with prostatic
cancer. Antibodies are combined with cellular toxins directed against
EGFR. Phase 1 trials are said to show “encouraging results.”
STOMACH
CANCER
Stomach, or gastric cancer is second in frequency
only to lung cancer around the world, but incidence rates and mortality
have declined in the United States and western Europe for several
decades. Rates are high in Japan, China and eastern Asia, Latin America
and eastern Europe. There are also high mortality rates in these areas.
Many
factors seem to contribute to gastric cancer, with strong correlation
between the tumors and the consumption of salted, smoked and pickled
foods. Better methods for preserving and storing foods are credited with
reducing the incidence. Studies are under way to determine if
beta-carotene, Vitamin C, is protective. It is known that H. pylori
bacteria, causing chronic gastritis, are also associated with cancer, so
anti-bacterial treatment is also being investigated. Cigarette smoking
has also be implicated.
GENETIC LINKS
The
Chinese are investigating possible genetic influence in areas of their
country where gastric carcinoma appears to be familial. There are also
families in other parts of the world in which familial diffuse gastric
cancer is transmitted by autsomal dominant inheritance and appears at a
young age. Guilford, Hopkins and associates found germ-line mutations in
the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene in several of these families in 1998. Three
out of every four carriers of this gene developed aggressive gastric
cancer, leading other investigators to consider the wisdom of
prophylactic gastrectomies. Five persons at risk who were studied by
Huntsman et al. underwent this surgery and all had microscopic evidence
of gastric cancer in the mucosal linings of their stomachs. The authors
recommend genetic counseling for young persons with similar family
histories of diffuse gastric cancer. Microscopic examination of cell
blocks and smears prepared from aspirated gastric fluid removed during a
gastroscopy can sometimes be useful in establishing a diagnosis, as
biopsies might miss the small multifocal lesions.
HELPING
WITH DECISIONS
We have already mentioned the importance of
consulting your family physician and the need for genetic counseling,
but there are many important decisions to be made after the diagnosis of
cancer is confirmed, especially when it comes to the selection of
treatments. The primary care physician has other resources available to
aid you in making these choices, including oncologists, who specialize
in cancer, and health care professionals engaged in clinical research.
The
explosion of genetic knowledge has resulted in many new possiblities
for specific treatment of cancer and other diseases, as laboratory
research reveals specific details about the mechanisms and molecular
pathways involved.
It becomes apparent that by blocking a certain
pathway or modifying the role of a key gene, a disease process may be
attacked in ways that were never before possible. In order to turn these
concepts into realities, it is essential to run carefullymonitored
clinical trials. But how is a patient to know which clinical trials are
applicable and learn about the possibilities of participation? There is
so much going on that it is difficult for even the most conscientious
primary care physician to be aware of all the current options.
There
are three phases for all trials for treatment. Phase I determines the
safest and best way to deliver the proposed new treatment. Phase II is
an evaluation of how effective it works; e.g., in cancer, it would see
how well it performed with various specific types. Phase III compares
the new method against the best ones currently in use. Other studies
involve ways to prevent cancers or manage symptoms and side effects.
An
organization has been established to serve the public through
education, training and professional support related to cancer clinical
trials. It is the Coalition of National Cancer Cooperative Groups, 1818
Market Street, Suite 1100, Philadelphia PA 19103. Their website is:
www.cancertrialshelp.org rom this coalition of over 8,000 oncology
professionals it should be possible to learn about government-approved
trials being conducted by oncologists and related industries.
There
are also Patient Advocacy Group Members, some of which are shown below.
If your specific interest is not included, we suggest you search the
internet under the name of the disease.
| Alliance for Lung Cancer Advocacy, Support and
Education |
www.alcase.org |
| Colon Cancer
Alliance |
www.ccaliance.org |
| Colorectal
Cancer Network |
www.colorectal-cancer.net |
| The Leukemia
and Lymphoma Society |
1-800-850-9132 |
| National Alliance of Breast Cancer Organizations |
ww.nabco.org |
| National Melanoma
Foundation |
www.nationalmelanoma.org |
| National
Ovarian Cancer Coalition |
www.ovarian.org |
| National Prostate Cancer Coalition |
www.pcacoalition |
| North American Brain
Tumor Coalition |
www.nabraintumor.org |
| Ovarian Cancer
National Alliance |
www.ovariancancer.org |
| Pancreatic
Cancer Action Network |
www.pancan.org |
| Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation |
www.breastcancerinfo.com |
Other resources are supported by sponsored by various
pharmaceutical and genomics companies:
Amgen Trials
Resource Center
www.AmgenTrials.com
Amgen:
1-866-572-6346
Cancer Clinical Trials Hotline
Aventic
Pharmaceuticals: 1-800-RxTrial
Cancer Survival Toolbox
www.cansearch.org/programs/toolbox.html
Clinical
Trials Resource Center
www.nccra.org
Pharmacia
Corp., Pfizer, National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance
1-800-724-4100
Cycle
of Hope
www.cycleofhope.org
Bristol-Myers-Squibb Co.:
1-800-717-HOPE
Novartis Oncology Clinical Trials
Information
Novartis: 1-800-340-6843
Strength
for Caring
www.StrengthforCaring.com
Ortho Biotech
Products, L.P.: 1-888-ICARE80
Lilly
1-877-CT-Lilly
www.lillytrials.com
The
National Cancer Institute has booklets, brochures, etc. for patients,
health professionals and the public on cancer, including various types,
coping with cancer, diagnostic testing and clinical trials for methods
of treatment. http//cancer.gov/publications
Cancer Information
Service: 1-800-4-CANCER
National Cancer Institute
31 Center Drive
MSC 2580
Bethesda MD 20892-2580
SELECTED REFERENCES ON CANCER GENETICS
Ahmedin
J, Thomas A, Taylor M & Thun M: Cancer Statistics 2002. CA Cancer J
Clin 2002; 52: 23-47
Miller BA et al: Racial/Ethnic Patterns of
Cancer in the U.S. 1988-1992. N.C.I. N.I H. Publ 96-4104, Bethesda MD
1996
National Cancer Institute -- U.S. Racial/Ethnic Cancer
Patterns
www.cancer.gov/cancerinformation
www.aca.ohiostate.edu/unitw/cancer/handbook/ethnic
Kim
HJ: Korean Society Medical Genetics, 1997.
medicalgenetics.or.ks/symposia
Dorak MT: Cancer Genetics. Merck
Manual, 2002
Knudson AG: Ann Rev. Genet. 1986; 20: 231-51
Wade
N: Genome Mappers Navigate the Tricky Terrain of Race. New York Times
20 Jul 2001
Ezekowitz RAB: What is the best way to treat
inherited disorders? N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 96-27
Greenlee RT et
al: Cancer Statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 2000; 50: 7-33
Golub
T, Chinnain A: ASCO/ASH Symposium: Redefining the Therapy and Prognosis
of Hematologic and Other Malignancies with Gene Array Technology.
Orlando, Fl. May 2002
Baker DL, Schuette JL, Uhlmann WR, eds: A
Guide to Genetic Counseling. New York, NY. Wiley & Liss, 1998
Bartels
DM, Le Toy BS, Caplan AL, eds: Prescribing our Future: Ethical
Challenges in Genetic Counseling. New York, NY. Aldine de Gruyter, 1993
National
Cancer Inst.: Cancer Genetics Overview (PDQ)
www.cancer.gov/03/2002
Nat.
Cancer Inst.: Genetics of Breast and Ovarian Cancer
www.nci.nih.gov/cancer_information/doc
Hedenfalk
I et al: Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. N Engl J
Med 2001; 344: 539-48
Montagna M: Allele-specific gene
expression (AGE) to identify BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Int
J Cancer 2002
Van ‘T Veer LJ et al.: Gene expression profiling
predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 2002; 415: 530-36
Genetics
in Aging: Environmental factors and breast cancer.
www.agingresearch.org/genticsinaging/brc
Struewing
JP et al: The risk of breast cancer with specific mutations of BRCA1
and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1401-8
The
Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium: Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation
carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 1310-16
Arver B et al:
Hereditary breast cancer: a review. Semin Cancer Biol 2000; 10: 171-288
Slattery
ML & Kerber RA: A comprehensive evaluation of family history and
breast cancer risk. The Utah Population Database. JAMA 1993; 270:
1563-68
Peto J et al.: Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene
mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst
1999; 91: 943-49
Meijers-Heijboer H et al.: Breast cancer after
prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutation. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 159-64
Haber D: Prophylactic
oophorectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian and breast cancer in carriers
of BRCA mutations. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1660-1662
Hereditary
Colorectal Cancer Registry, 1999. Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore MD
21205
Byers T: Diet, colorecrtal adenomas, and colorectal cancer.
N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1206-07
Midgley R, Kerr D: Colorectal
cancer. Lancet 2000; 353: 391-99
Mayer RJ: Gastrointestinal
Cancer. New York: Scientific American Medicine, March 1996
webmd.lycos.com/content/article:
Gastrointestinal Cancer
Watanabe T et al: Molecular predictors
of survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med
2001; 344: 1196-1206
Gnarra Jr et al: Mutations of the VHL tumor
suppressive gene in renal carcinoma. Nature Genetics 1994; 260: 11317-20
Latif
F et al: Identification of the Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressive
gene. Science 1994; 260: 1317-20
Amos CI: Polymorphisms for
ethnicity differences in p53, risks for lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst
2002; 94: 681-90
Gerber M et al: Lung cancer genes.
www.stanfordhospital.com
Olopade OI: Genetics in Clinical Cancer
Care -- The Future is Now. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1455-56
Lymphoma:
www.oncologychannel.com/nonhodgkins/riskfactors
Gilchrist BA et
al: The pathogenesis of melanoma induced by ultraviolet irradiation. N
Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1341-2
Kim CJ et al: Immunotherapy for
melanoma. Cancer Control 2002; 9: 22-30
Goldstein AM, Tucker MA:
Dermatology Clin 1995; 13: 605-12
Hereditary Melanoma:
www.genetics.com.au/genetics/resource
Bristow RE & Karlan BY:
Ovulation induction, infertility and ovarian cancer risk. Fertil Steril
1996; 66: 499-507
WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia &
Steroid Contraceptives. Epithelial ovarian cancer and combined oral
contraceptives. Int J Epidemiol 1989; 18: 538-545
Berchuk A et
al.: Managing hereditary ovarian cancer risk. Cancer 1999; 86: 2517-24
Narod
SA et al: Oral contraceptives and the risk of herediatry ovarian
cancer. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 424-28
Holschneider CH &
Berek JS: Ovarian cancer: epidemiology, biology and prognostic factors.
Semin Surg Oncol 2000; 14: 3-10
Kauf, ND et al.: Risk-reducing
salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Eng J
Med 2002; 346: 1609-15
Rebbeck TR et al.: Prophylactic
o0ophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med
2002; 346: 1616-22
Arnold MA & Goggins M: BRCA2 and
predisposition to pancreatic and other cancers. Expert Reviews in
Molecular Med. Cambridge U. Press, 2001
Prostate cancer genetics:
my.webmd.com
Prostate cancer genetics:
www.agingresearch.org/geneticsinaging
Prostate cancer genetics:
www.nhgri.nighgov/DIR/LCG/PROSTATE
Barry MJ:
Prostate-specific-antigen testing for early diagnosis of prostate
cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1373-77
Chinnaigan AM et al:
Prognostic biomarkers for prostatic cancer. Nature 2001; 412: 822-826
Barton
J, Blackledge G, Wakeling A: Growth factors: new targets for prostate
cancer. Urology 2001; 58: 114-122
Guilford P et al.: E-cadherin
germline mutations in familial gastric cancer.
Nature 1998; 392:
402-405
Huntsman DG et al: Early gastric cancer in young,
asymptomatic carriers of germ-line E-cadherin mutations. N Engl J Med
2001; 344: 1904-09